Granted, Lo Duca is 35 years old. One could make the case that the Mets need to get rid of Paulie anyway and grab a younger catching replacement. Ronny Paulino looks like a good choice - the Pirates' backstop is hitting .231 this season with 24 RBIs and a gargantuan .346 slugging percentage. Seems like a no-brainer.
Really though. Why Paul Lo Duca? This guy has been the heart and soul the last two years of a Mets team that has quickly become the class of the National League. The kind of team that other teams gun for. A team that Lo Duca has been right at the center of.
Remember Opening Day 2006? Our self-described "magician" of a catcher played a magic trick on Alfonso Soriano and the Washington Nationals, dropping the ball on a key play at the plate in the 8th inning but picking it up in time to hide the drop from the Home Plate Umpire and help seal a one-run victory for the Mets that kicked off and in many ways set the tone for last year's amazin' season.
The Mets gave twin 40 year-olds Tom Glavine and Orlando Hernandez new contracts at the end of last season because both were important components of last year's team and were considered to be critical to the Mets' immediate future. In other words, if the team valued Lo Duca enough, his age wouldn't get in the way of giving him a one or two year contract extension to have him stay on and continue to be a solid catcher and fiery clubhouse presence until a prospect such as Francisco Pena or somebody else in the Mets' minor league system is ready to take over behind the dish at Citi Field.
The Mets should really reconsider the manner in which they're treating Paul Lo Duca. Paulie's a Brooklyn-born native son who seemed to fit in perfectly with the team until all of this recent nonsense, and the Mets will be making a big mistake if they continue to overlook and undervalue his contributions.
(Photos courtesy of gettyimages)
2 comments:
So does this mean you take back your comments that the story about a division in the Mets clubhouse is unfounded?
No; as I say, and as Rubin points out in his article, the Mets players seem to be getting behind Lo Duca. Hardly a sign of clubhouse tension.
I'm most angry at Mets management, who seem to be undervaluing Lo Duca. If there is indeed a "latino slant" in the Met clubhouse, this is evidence of it and it's being made worse by the front office, not the players
Post a Comment